My first mix went up on Mixcloud in 2012. It was a two-hour set recorded off a Pioneer DJM-800 in a practice room in Itaewon, nothing special technically, but it had a run of about forty minutes in the middle that I was genuinely proud of. I uploaded it and over the following week it got a hundred and twelve plays. That was, at the time, more people than I had played to in the previous three months combined, and it felt significant. I checked the stats obsessively for about a fortnight, then life moved on and I forgot to check, and when I came back three months later the number was still a hundred and twelve.
That pattern repeated for the next decade. Not universally, some mixes found a small audience, some got picked up in Mixcloud’s own recommendations and had a brief spike, but the underlying reality was that Mixcloud is a platform where things are uploaded and then stay, mostly undiscovered, in a growing library that has no meaningful discovery engine for the people already on it. I stayed because leaving felt like abandoning an archive, and because I believed in what the platform was trying to do with its licensing model. But I have stopped uploading new material, and I want to explain why clearly, because I think the reasoning applies to any DJ who is still treating Mixcloud as their primary mix-sharing platform in 2026.
What Mixcloud Got Right
The licensing model was, and remains, genuinely important. Mixcloud pays licensing fees to rights holders, which means a DJ mixing copyrighted music can share that work legally without the constant threat of takedown that has made SoundCloud a precarious home for DJ mixes since around 2015. The principle, that platforms can build a legal infrastructure for recorded DJ performance that compensates artists and producers, is one I want to see work. The fact that it has been working on Mixcloud for over a decade while the alternatives are either illegal, semi-legal, or dependent on YouTube’s content ID system is worth acknowledging.
The community in the early years was also real. There was a period where Mixcloud had an active listener base that treated it the way people treated MySpace Music in 2007, as a genuine place to discover DJs whose work you would not find anywhere else. I connected with a handful of listeners through that period who became real parts of my extended network, people who showed up at gigs, who sent messages about specific mixes, who cared about what was happening in the set. That kind of engagement is what you hope for when you share recorded work.
Where the Platform Lost Me
The discovery problem has never been solved. Mixcloud’s algorithm surfaces content that already has engagement, which means new uploads from established accounts get pushed, and everything else disappears into the archive. If you do not already have a large following on the platform, the mechanics work against you. The plays do not compound the way they do on YouTube, and the social layer, follows, favourites, reposts, is too thin to build the kind of network effect that makes a platform sticky for listeners rather than just uploaders.
Mixcloud’s fan subscriptions, launched as Select and now part of Mixcloud Pro, were meant to allow DJs to monetise their listeners directly, and could have been a real alternative revenue stream. In practice, it requires a listener base that is already engaged enough to pay, which most DJs on the platform do not have, and the revenue split and minimum payout thresholds make it unworkable for anyone outside the platform’s top tier. I tried it for eighteen months. The earnings would not have covered the monthly cost of the coffee I drank while uploading.
The mobile experience and the web interface have improved slowly, but Mixcloud still feels like a product being maintained rather than one being developed toward something. Compare it to the pace of change on YouTube or even Bandcamp and the trajectory is not encouraging.
What Works Better Now
For recorded mixes, YouTube has become the practical standard for the DJs I know whose mixes find real audiences. The discoverability is fundamentally better, the playback experience on mobile is stronger, and a mix that connects with the algorithm can find listeners across years rather than having a brief spike and then settling. The trade-off is that YouTube’s content ID system means some mixes get muted, monetised by labels, or taken down, which is a real cost. But the base of listeners who use YouTube for music discovery vastly exceeds the base that uses Mixcloud.
Bandcamp is the better answer for original productions and properly released mixes, particularly if you are working with a label or releasing under your own imprint. The economics are significantly better than any streaming-adjacent platform, and the listener relationship you build there tends to be more durable because it involves a transaction rather than passive consumption. People who buy a mix from you on Bandcamp are more likely to come to your gigs than people who queued it up on Mixcloud once and forgot.
SoundCloud remains genuinely useful for short-form material and for reaching a DJ-specific audience that still uses it as a feed. The copyright enforcement is inconsistent, which is either a feature or a problem depending on your position, but the community infrastructure for electronic music specifically is still denser than Mixcloud’s.
The Archive Question
The decision I have not made is what to do with the thirteen years of mixes that live on my Mixcloud profile. Deleting them feels wrong, partly for sentimental reasons and partly because some of them represent documentation of nights and periods that do not exist anywhere else. Leaving them up as an archive with no new content is what I am doing by default, and it is probably the right answer: the profile becomes a historical record rather than an active presence, and the platform continues to pay whatever fraction of a fraction of a cent in licensing for each play.
What I am not doing is uploading new work there, because the honest assessment is that the effort-to-reach ratio is worse than any other platform I use, and the direction of travel for the platform does not suggest that is going to change. If you are a DJ making similar decisions about where to put your recorded output, the framework I would suggest is: use YouTube for mixes where discovery matters, Bandcamp for releases where you want listener investment, and SoundCloud if you are already active there. Mixcloud as your primary platform is a choice that makes less sense in 2026 than it did in 2014, and that is not about disloyalty to a platform I genuinely wanted to succeed.
My Own Mixcloud Story
I uploaded a lot of mixes to Mixcloud over the years. I chose it originally because it was licensed to pay the producers whose tracks were in my mixes, and that mattered to me. I also liked the interface: a mix just looked better there, with the tracklist laid out, than it did on SoundCloud, where I had a couple of mixes taken down back in the day.
The problem was traction. Mixcloud became a place where DJs post their mixes for other DJs, and there was never a big listenership outside that circle. Most people now listen to music on Apple Music, YouTube Music and Spotify, and that is where their attention lives.
So in all honesty, these days I post my mixes to YouTube, in video format. It is not perfect, but that is where the listeners are.
Go Deeper: Watch, Listen, Read
Different views on where recorded DJ mixes should live, and how licensing works behind them.
- Mixcloud Help: How the Creator Subscriptions Revenue Model Works: the official split, showing how much goes to rights holders before the DJ.
- Digital DJ Tips: How and Where to Share Your DJ Mixes: a 2021 guide that still puts Mixcloud first, a useful counterpoint to this piece.
- Music Business Worldwide: Mixcloud Acquires Encore: the 2024 deal that shows Mixcloud, still independent, pushing into live bookings.
- Boiler Room on YouTube: the clearest example of DJ sets finding a huge audience as video.
- Boiler Room: Archive of DJ Mixes Now on Apple Music: how a licensed deal put DJ mixes on a mainstream streaming service.
- Wikipedia: Dubset: the company that tried to clear DJ mixes for Spotify and Apple Music, and why it matters.
FAQ
Why are DJs leaving Mixcloud?
The discovery mechanics work against new content from accounts without established followings, the platform has developed slowly compared to alternatives, and the revenue opportunities through Mixcloud’s fan subscriptions are not realistic for most DJs. The audience that uses Mixcloud for music discovery is significantly smaller than the equivalent audience on YouTube or SoundCloud.
Is Mixcloud still worth using for DJs in 2026?
As an archive for past mixes, yes. As an active platform for sharing new material if you want that material to find listeners, the effort-to-reach ratio is poor compared to YouTube or SoundCloud. Mixcloud’s licensing model remains genuinely valuable, but licensing compliance does not compensate for weak discovery.
What is the best platform for sharing DJ mixes?
YouTube for maximum discoverability, Bandcamp for releases where listener investment and direct revenue matter, SoundCloud for reaching a community already active there. The right answer depends on what you are trying to achieve: discovery, documentation, or monetisation each have a different optimal platform.
Does Mixcloud pay DJs?
Mixcloud’s fan subscriptions (formerly Select) let DJs accept subscriptions from their audience, with creators receiving 60 percent of what remains after licensing and transaction fees, but the mechanism requires a pre-existing engaged listener base to generate meaningful income, and the platform’s discovery issues make building that base difficult. Mixcloud pays licensing fees to rights holders on behalf of DJs, which is its most significant and genuine contribution to the ecosystem.
Should I delete my old mixes from Mixcloud?
Probably not. An existing archive has low maintenance cost and some archival value. The better question is whether to add new material, and for most DJs the answer in 2026 is to prioritise platforms where discovery is stronger. Keep the archive; do not feed it new content if reach is the goal.
Further Reading
- Wikipedia: the history of Mixcloud and its licensing model for DJ mixes
- Wikipedia: Bandcamp and why artists use it for direct sales
- YouTube Help: how Content ID matches and claims music in uploaded mixes
- Wikipedia: the DJ mix as a recorded format
Written from Seoul, by someone who has been in the booth for more than twenty years. More on the site, or book a DJ.
Stay in the Loop
New writing on DJ culture, electronic music, and the Seoul underground, delivered when it matters.
More From The DJ Diaries
Play with the history
Four tools built from the same research as this site.
