The vinyl revival is real, but it is not a revolution. It is a choice, and choices cost money.
In 2023, UK vinyl sales exceeded CD sales for the first time since 1987. The narrative was straightforward: the format never died, it endured through the streaming era, it is now experiencing a genuine renaissance. This narrative is partially true and significantly misleading about what the vinyl revival actually represents.
The people actually buying vinyl are not young people discovering analog as a pure experience. Resident Advisor surveyed vinyl DJs in 2024 and found that the majority of vinyl buyers are over 35 years old and buying music they already owned on CD or have known for decades. The vinyl revival is not a youth movement. It is a movement of people with disposal income rediscovering a format they once abandoned.
The production culture argument has genuine merit. Vinyl encourages sequencing because you cannot skip forward without lifting the tonearm. A vinyl record is a fixed sequence of songs in a fixed order, which means that the person making the record has to think about the arc of the listening experience. But the constraint is not magical — a person making a record for Bandcamp or Apple Music can think about sequencing just as carefully. The format does not guarantee discipline. It just makes the lack of discipline more visible.
The vinyl revival has been good for independent electronic music labels in some ways and neutral in others. The resurgence of interest in physical formats has given labels a reason to press records that they might not have pressed in a purely streaming-optimised world. But the economics of vinyl remain challenging: a 500-copy pressing run costs 1,500-3,000 pounds, takes 10-16 months to arrive, and must be sold at 10-15 pounds per record just to break even.
Stay in the Loop
New writing on DJ culture, electronic music, and the Seoul underground — delivered when it matters.
